Why the Market Chooses Own-Root Roses: Guide & Benefits – PharmaRosa®

Why is the market turning back?

Why did budding become the foundation of rose cultivation for decades, and why is the market now shifting back towards own-root roses? On this page we guide you through the history of the rose trade: from the birth of modern varieties to bare-root logistics and the online era. You will discover why the budding union is a horticultural “weak point”, and what this means for you in your garden. What is your main criterion when choosing a rose?

How did the rose evolve from a closely guarded treasure of castle gardens into the most popular flower of garden centres and home gardens? Why did growers start budding, and why are they now returning to own-root roses?

A rose bush carries not only flowers but history as well. We show the path that led to the birth of modern roses, the reasons behind the changes in cultivation techniques, and why it still matters for you today to know what a rose is made from and how it becomes what it is.


When did roses first enter the market?

The earliest documented rose trade dates back to the 17th–18th centuries, when rose breeding and collecting were no longer the privilege of the nobility but were becoming increasingly accessible to the middle classes. In Europe, the first nurseries specifically propagating roses for sale appeared in France and England.

How were roses propagated and grown in the 17th–19th centuries?

  • Layering: This was the oldest and most straightforward method. Rose shoots were bent down to the soil, covered with earth and, once roots had formed, separated from the mother plant. It took a long time but gave reliable results. The roses thus grew on their own roots.
  • Division: Used mainly for species that naturally form clumps or produce suckers. The plant was lifted and divided into sections – several individuals were obtained from a single stock plant. The new plants continued to grow on their own roots.
  • Cuttings: Although today this is one of the main propagation methods for own-root roses, at that time it was rarely used because rooting techniques were not widely available.
  • Seed sowing: Used for breeding, as seed-grown roses show a wide range of appearances. Variety identity could not be guaranteed, so it was of limited use in production.

Turning point: 1867 – the beginning of modern roses

This was the year the world’s first officially recognised hybrid tea rose, ‘La France’, appeared. It not only introduced a new type of flower shape and fragrance, but also launched a completely new era in commercial rose production. From then on, the rose was not just an ornamental plant but a mass-market product – a whole network of nurseries, breeders and growers formed around it.

What made this possible?

  • Varieties with large blooms that could be propagated well.
  • A shippable format (bare-root plants).
  • Budding as an industrial-scale technology – a single bud (eye) of the cultivated rose was fitted onto a wild rose rootstock (e.g. Rosa canina); this was the best method for rapidly propagating identical varieties with the technology available at the time.
  • Market demand, initially for ornamental gardens, then for public plantings.

Cultivation – the beginnings of nursery rose fields

Roses started to be sold as ornamental plants on the markets of larger towns, first in pots and later as bare-root plants. Open-field growing was the norm, and the plants were often sold at fairs and markets by itinerant gardeners or nursery assistants.

By the middle of the 19th century, a seasonal cycle of transport and sales had developed: lifting in autumn, transport in winter, planting in spring. By the second half of the 19th century, the rose had become a mass-produced, marketable product. From then on, it was no longer only about beauty, but also about how to produce roses efficiently, cheaply and in a transportable form, and how to deliver them to the customer.


The weak point of budded roses: the budding union

The budding union, where the bud of the cultivated rose is joined to the rootstock, is sensitive and vulnerable. This part:

  • is prone to frost damage,
  • is sensitive to physical injury,
  • can become waterlogged under weeds or heavy mulching,
  • may weaken over time.

The differing genetics of root and shoot can cause long-term biological imbalance, especially in older plants. Some varieties tend to “break away” from the rootstock after a number of years.


Deliberate protection or retraining?

Today, many gardeners try to protect the cultivated part by planting the budding union below soil level. But this is more than merely protection: if the cultivated part develops its own roots, the plant returns to an “own-root” state.

This is a conscious cultivation decision: the rose shifts onto its own roots and becomes independent of the rootstock.

In fact, it can be seen as a form of retraining:

  • it increases the plant’s self-reliance and ability to regenerate,
  • its lifespan may be extended,
  • diseases and weaknesses originating from the rootstock can be avoided.

21st century constraints – and a new role

In recent decades, rose production and trade have been radically transformed. The once dominant budded rose is facing more and more challenges as a result of market, social and technological change.

What has changed?

  • Labour shortages: budding requires a lot of manual work. In a single season, the insertion, pruning back and care of tens of thousands of buds calls for precise skilled labour – at a time when trained workers are increasingly scarce.
  • Wider product range but lower volumes: in the past, large series were produced from 5–10 rose varieties. Today, buyers look for a wide assortment in smaller quantities, which makes budding more expensive per plant and less economical. The ornamental plant range has expanded with many other species as well.
  • Generational change in home gardens: new garden owners often do not know the specific needs of budded roses (e.g. protecting the budding union, dealing with dieback, pruning rootstock shoots). They have little time and look for simpler solutions.
  • The rise of online shopping: the storage and shipping window for bare-root budded roses is short. Although cold storage can extend it, this often reduces quality (loss of moisture, root damage, stress).

The rediscovery of own-root roses

Modern technology has made it possible to propagate own-root roses reliably on a large scale.

  • Storability: they can be stored and transported in containers – dormancy is not required.
  • Variety range: more flexible; new varieties can be introduced faster, without waiting years for rootstocks suitable for budding.
  • User-friendly: they do not require special protection or pruning back, which makes them more attractive to today’s customers.
  • Quality and availability: own-root roses are in balance with the expectations of the modern market: simpler, more accessible and more reliable.

The era of the budded rose is fading

The budded rose – which is labour-intensive and only economical in large quantities per variety – fits less and less with the needs of today’s ornamental plant market. Own-root roses, by contrast, are easier to grow, simpler for the end user and more flexible in distribution. The rose market now sees them as a reform product – not as a step backwards, but as a response to the challenges of our time.

Why is the market turning towards own-root roses?

When we say that “the era of the budded rose is fading”, we are not questioning the professional value of budding. The key point is that the business model of the budded (grafted/budded onto a rootstock), typically bare-root rose is finding it increasingly difficult to meet today’s expectations of flexibility, logistics and user experience in several sales channels. At the same time, the own-root (mostly container-grown) rose is in many situations easier to plan with, offers more consistent quality and involves less risk for the customer.

1) Why did budding become the “industry standard” for so long?

With the mass spread of modern roses, from the late 19th century onwards, roses became a genuine mass-market product. At that time budding was the best tool for this, because it:

  • allowed fast and true-to-type propagation in large quantities,
  • established a shippable bare-root product model with a seasonal cycle (lifting–storage–transport–planting),
  • in many cases helped the initial development and adaptation of roses under specific soil and climatic conditions.

This system worked best when relatively few varieties were grown in large series, and when trade operated mainly in an offline, strongly seasonal mode.

2) What has changed for producers in the 21st century?

Budding is a high-quality technology, but it is labour-intensive and in several steps depends heavily on manual work. Today this is an increasing constraint:

  • Labour shortages and wage pressure: budding requires trained, precise seasonal workers.
  • More varieties, smaller series: customers want a wide choice in smaller batches; as a result, unit costs increase.
  • Planning and risk: more manual stages mean more potential for errors and more organisational exposure.

The result: budding can still be efficient for very large, uniform batches, but in many of today’s market channels this is no longer the favoured production logic.

3) What has changed in trade and logistics?

Online sales and fast, order-driven fulfilment favour product formats that can be handled flexibly. For bare-root roses, the season tied to dormancy often means a narrow time window, and longer storage can carry quality risks (loss of moisture, root stress, general stress).

The container-grown model, by contrast, is often saleable over a much longer period and can be aligned more closely with delivery logistics. This is particularly important where customers do not buy within a single “season window”, but whenever they make their decision.

4) Professional horticultural aspect: the budding union as a risk point

The budding union (the junction between rootstock and scion) is a biologically and physically sensitive connection. In practice, several potential problems converge at this single point:

  • Frost damage and vulnerability: the junction is more easily damaged in adverse conditions.
  • Need for intervention: mulching, planting depth, dealing with dieback – all require knowledge and attention.
  • Rootstock shoots: these need to be recognised and removed regularly, which is a frequent source of user error.

This is not a “fault” of budding, but a practical reality arising from the nature of the technology: more risk and more tasks are transferred to the end user.

5) Why is the own-root rose a “reform product”?

The rise of own-root roses is not a fashion, but a natural fit with today’s conditions:

From the producer’s perspective:

  • Fewer stages that are “critically dependent on manual work”, which in many cases means more reliable planning.
  • In operations with small batch sizes and a wide variety range, it often allows more flexible stock management.
  • In container systems, the plant’s condition can in many cases be controlled better up to the point of dispatch.

From the user’s perspective:

  • No issues with rootstock suckers.
  • If the plant suffers frost damage, regeneration takes place from the same variety.
  • Fewer “rules” and fewer potential mistakes – a more user-friendly experience.

6) Nuance: budded roses still have their place

Budded roses are still justified and competitive in certain situations: for large, uniform batches, under specific soil and climate conditions, or where maintenance is professional and care routines are strictly followed. The change is therefore not a technological verdict, but a shift in market emphasis.

7) What should you take away from this as a garden owner?

  • If you prefer simpler care and less risk, own-root roses are in many cases a clearer choice.
  • If you are planting in particularly difficult conditions, it is worth weighing up, from a professional point of view, whether the advantages of a rootstock bring real benefits.

In summary: own-root roses move into the foreground wherever the market rewards flexibility, a longer sales window, more stable condition at delivery and a more user-friendly experience. This is not a step back, but a modern answer to today’s challenges.


Do you have questions about the difference between budded and own-root roses?

We will help you see clearly which option is better for your garden and your goals.

  • when budding is an advantage and when the budding union represents a risk,
  • what the “market shift” towards own-root roses means (with horticultural and economic reasons),
  • how care differs (frost, pruning back, rootstock shoots, regeneration),
  • container-grown and bare-root roses: when it is worth choosing which,
  • what planting depth, position and basic care are recommended in your situation.

Ask by e-mail   Or write to us directly:  [email protected]


PharmaRosa® Own root – a new era
The new generation of rose growing.

Product types

Pages for private customers
Garden roses for the family garden, with minimal care  → ORIGINAL®
Premium garden roses – instant impact, a truly showpiece garden  → EXTRA®
Pages for professionals and private customers
Roses for public spaces – large areas, sustainable maintenance  → NATURAL®
Roses for projects – hedge and row planting, fast implementation  → RAPID®
For professional partners only
Production – propagation material for garden roses, wholesale  → NEONATAL®

Company details

PharmaRosa Ltd.
Company registration number: 01-09-717479
VAT number: 13075314-2-43
Plant health registration no.: HU130721
Bank account (IBAN):
HU85117631891388688400000000
BIC (SWIFT): OTPVHUHB
Bank name: OTP Bank Nyrt.